Photo by Emily Karakis on Unsplash
Epstein Series — Part 2
Abuse on this scale doesn’t survive on secrecy alone.
It survives on respectability.
When we talk about the Epstein network, we can’t just analyze the man at the center — Jeffrey Epstein — we have to interrogate the systems that wrapped him in credibility, access, and protection.
Predators don’t thrive in the shadows.
They thrive in institutions.
Universities. Hospitals. Philanthropy circles. Professional titles.
Places that signal trust — and therefore silence victims.
This is how power launders abuse.
Respectability as a Shield
In patriarchal societies, authority is often mistaken for morality.
When a man is:
- wealthy
- educated
- professionally connected
- publicly “generous”
he is presumed safe.
Epstein wasn’t seen as dangerous — he was seen as a donor, a consultant, a visionary, a man with influence.
Respectability didn’t just protect him.
It made him untouchable.
And this is key: institutions don’t just overlook abuse — they actively buffer it.
Universities: Where Power Buys Legitimacy
Elite academic spaces are especially good at laundering reputations.
Epstein embedded himself within institutions like Harvard University, where proximity to professors, research, and prestige reframed him as an intellectual benefactor rather than a predator.
When powerful men attach themselves to education, they gain:
- moral credibility
- social insulation
- access to young people
- institutional silence
Universities benefit from the money.
Predators benefit from the legitimacy.
And when accusations arise?
Institutions default to protecting funding, not victims.
Medical Authority: When Harm Wears a Lab Coat
Doctors and “consultants” played a crucial role in normalizing abuse.
Medical spaces are culturally coded as safe, neutral, and ethical — which makes them perfect cover.
When men in positions of medical authority:
- evaluate victims
- dismiss trauma
- frame abuse as psychological confusion
they don’t just ignore harm.
They rewrite it.
This is how violence becomes:
“misunderstanding,”
“complicated relationships,”
“troubled girls.”
Medicine, under patriarchy, often prioritizes male credibility over female pain.
And once trauma is medicalized, it becomes easier to disbelieve.
Donors, Buildings, and Bought Silence
Money doesn’t just open doors.
It closes mouths.
When wealthy men fund institutions, their names become brands:
- on buildings
- on programs
- on scholarships
- on press releases
To question them becomes a “risk.”
Not just reputational — financial.
So institutions quietly choose:
Predator > victims
Funding > justice
Stability > accountability
This isn’t corruption in the shadows.
It’s business as usual.
Whose Trauma Is Believed?
Here’s the feminist truth at the center of all this:
Institutions are built to trust powerful men — not vulnerable women.
Especially not:
- young girls
- poor girls
- abused girls
- girls without social capital
Patriarchy teaches us that credibility flows upward with class, wealth, and status.
So when a billionaire says one thing and a teenage girl says another — society already knows who it plans to believe.
Not based on evidence.
Based on hierarchy.
The System Working Exactly as Designed
Epstein didn’t outsmart these institutions.
He fit perfectly inside them.
Because universities protect donors.
Because medicine protects authority.
Because wealth protects itself.
Because patriarchy protects powerful men.
Abuse isn’t a glitch in the system.
It’s something the system quietly absorbs.
The Feminist Takeaway
When we focus only on individual predators, we miss the machinery that keeps them safe.
Men like Epstein require:
✔ institutional credibility
✔ professional validation
✔ financial influence
✔ cultural respectability
to operate at scale.
Predators don’t act alone.
They act supported.

Leave a Reply